User talk:Sputniktilt

Memorial Norbert Zongo

Thank you for adding the photography to Norbert Zongo! Good work, Crtew (talk) 17:45, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

You added a photo on a page I've been watching for sometime. Thank you for your contribution!!! Crtew (talk) 17:46, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

thank you! --Sputniktilt (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bumblebee in flight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good. --Ralf Roletschek 12:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rolleiflex f2-8-F.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilioceris merdigera 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --Gidip 23:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee on Echinacea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 23:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bee on Heliopsis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 23:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus pascuorum Zurich front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me --Lmbuga 19:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus pascuorum Zurich lateral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good macro shot. --Tuxyso 21:21, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Monument des martyrs.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument des martyrs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok--Lmbuga 09:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

QI entries

Hi Sputniktilt.

Sorry no, I did not : We are many uploaders on the QIC page at the moment, so it generates "edict conflicts". I suffered a lot of them a few minutes ago. This is normal. But your church is now online. There is nothing we can do, except re-nominate. All is normal. Cheers !--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

I know; it happened to me, too. But sometimes it is good to know. Have a nice evening. --Sputniktilt (talk) 16:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tudor Prince Date Day Ref76200.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 22:03, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche Muri bei Bern 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Conelli 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok but sky a bit noisy, can you put a little bit of noise reduction on it please? --Christian Ferrer 21:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--Sputniktilt 22:22, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Also please crop on the left to remove the INS. Mattbuck 20:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)  Done--Sputniktilt 23:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Mattbuck 20:48, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bombus pascuorum Zurich lateral.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bombus pascuorum Zurich lateral.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Which camera and lens have been used? 141.51.189.177 22:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Olympus OM-D E-M5 with M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro. -- Sputniktilt (talk) 22:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Monument des martyrs.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument des Héros Nationaux, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must linked the scope to the category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Info Scope linked. --Sputniktilt (talk) 08:55, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:10, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lilioceris merdigera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 11:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rolleiflex f2.8 F.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question What is the exact type? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Info A Rolleiflex f2.8 F - see filename and description. -- Sputniktilt (talk) 12:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Since you know the model you have to put in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Sputniktilt (talk) 22:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cathedral of Our Lady of Immaculate Conception, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Agree, it's best in scope, but please add geolocation. Halavar (talk) 21:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
 Done --Sputniktilt (talk) 22:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Great. All criteria met. Halavar (talk) 00:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:43, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zuerichhorn Steg 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 17:53, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Sputniktilt⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformierte Kirche, Muri bei Bern, Switzerland. View from SE..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : you're right but could you add "NW (or SE...) view" to the scope as we ususally do here, please ? --JLPC (talk) 17:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
 Done I added the view to the scope as well as to the summary of the file description. Hope it is fine like this. -- Sputniktilt (talk) 20:15, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

 Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Facade IMA Paris Jean Nouvel.jpg

File:Facade IMA Paris Jean Nouvel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Myrabella (talk) 08:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Sputniktilt,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Photo challenge

Hi. I see you have added two images to Category:Photo challenge/2014 - April-May - Politics and politicians. Please note that if you intend to participate in the challenge you must also add your entries at Commons:Photo challenge#Entries 4. HelenOnline 09:08, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Done - thank you for the hint! --Sputniktilt (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philipp Kutter 2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera 2013 Zurich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera 2013 Zurich 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J.-H. Janßen 11:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera 2014 Zurich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please mind COM:OVERCAT. --A.Savin 11:28, 27 May 2014 (UTC) OK --Sputniktilt 18:41, 27 May 2014 (UTC)  Support OK for QI. --A.Savin 10:52, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera on Scabiosa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus hypnorum Zurich 2014 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bee in focus, good colours and overall quality --D-Kuru 20:07, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mossi people, Nakoobo ceremony of the mossi chief Naaaba Zomb Wobgo at Andemtenga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support very useful. --P e z i (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bombus pascuorum 2014 Zurich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:24, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - April-May - Politics and politicians/Voting

Thanks for participating with photo challenge. Unfortunately the rules forbid voting on one's own pictures. I've had to remove your votes here. If you wish to redistribute and recast your votes, you still have a little time left. FYI, you voted 0/3 for Al Gore gestures 1992 and 1/3 for Jim Hunt on the campaign trail 1992, which remain (though you may wish to change what you give). -- Colin (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

oops - sorry for that, I wasn't aware of it! Thank you for the hint. --Sputniktilt (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User VG-4}}and {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

This user is able to contribute with an expert level on vector graphics.

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:00, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion! --Sputniktilt (talk) 20:25, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The War on Drugs 2014 Zurich 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Left side leaning in. small artefacts. can be resolved by proper reprocessing IMO. --Cccefalon 07:58, 8 August 2015 (UTC)  Comment better like this? --Sputniktilt 21:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)  Support looks good for a concert photograph. --SkywalkerPL 21:35, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 02:02, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harper Reed 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 20:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corvus corone, Paris 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:47, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Lizenz-Issue in QI

Hallo Sputniktilt, bei meinem QI File:Cruise ship Viking VE in Bamberg MD Kanal 17RM0086.jpg hast du Lizenzprobleme festgestellt. Wie ist denn das gemeint? Kannst du mir da einen Tipp geben? Gruß Reinhold Möller--Ermell (talk) 12:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Reinhold, danke für deine Nachricht. Das erste Problem ist ein ganz allgemeines: es gibt entsprechend den QI-Guidelines beschränkte Lizenzierungsmöglichkeiten für QI-Bilder; deine Permissions-Variante weicht davon ab. Zweitens schränkst du mit dem Permissions-Block {{Ermell/No-new-version}} die Möglichkeit zum teilen ein, indem du ausdrücklich die Teilung in Sozialen Medien verbietest ("This specifically excludes use in social media". du relativierst diese Aussage zwar gleich anschliessend, aber es ist verwirrend und steht im Widerspruch zu der von dir verwendeten Lizenz {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}, welche das Sharing unter bestimmten Bedingungen erlaubt, dabei aber keine Kanäle ausschliesst. Es ist ein Detail, denn du hast die Widerspruchsklausel ja drin – vielleicht ist das einfach noch niemandem aufgefallen. Was meinst du dazu? (FYI: Ich finde einfache und klare Lizenzen gut, bin aber kein warrior in dieser Frage, war mehr zufällig drauf gestossen. Deshalb habe ich auch nur ein File getaggt, obwohl du viele Dateien so lizenziert hast) Gruß, -- Sputniktilt (talk) 15:52, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Sputniktilt, das mit dem allgemeinen Problem sehe ich auch so. Dieses {{Ermell/No-new-version}} Template habe ich von anderen übernommen und ein bisschen modifiziert. Genau genommen betrifft das dann wohl einen großen Teil der Beitragenden. Das Thema begegnet mir in dieser Form zum ersten mal. Ich hätte kein Problem das wegzulassen, denn irgendwelche Ansprüche durchzusetzen sehe ich mich nicht in der Lage, was auch schon an den Kontrollmöglichkeiten scheitern würde. Ist diese Thema denn auch noch an anderer Stelle präsent? Danke für die umfangreiche Antwort. Gruß --Ermell (talk) 09:36, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Lieber Reinhold: Nein. Das Thema ist soweit ich den Überblick habe nirgendwo präsent. Ich will keine schlafenden Hunde wecken. Daher: lassen wir es doch so, wie es ist :-) Gruß, --Sputniktilt (talk) 21:01, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:57, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sehr schöne Aufnahme. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mantodea 2017 Koroni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 08.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cicadidae 2017 Koroni 08.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rolleiflex F2-8-f right.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Acrida ungarica 2017 Koroni 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Acrida ungarica 2017 Koroni 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomisus onustus with Bumblebee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice shot. Charlesjsharp 21:45, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started It is a world event. The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th. In Africa two weeks later. Here you can find more details. This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...). #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stade du 4 aout Ouaga.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Place des cineastes Ouaga.jpg

File:Place des cineastes Ouaga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

I had an official permit to photograph, issued by the municipality of Ouagadougou. Without this permission I could not have taken the picture at this place. -Sputniktilt (talk) 11:39, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Memorial ouaga2000.jpg

And also:

• File:Monument des martyrs 2013.jpg
• File:Monument des martyrs.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)