User talk:Kenraiz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Kenraiz!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Ficaria verna bulbils[edit]

Hi Kenraiz! I have just uploaded some photos of Ficaria bulbils, including [this one]. I see you had done so too, a year or so ago. You have identified yours as Ficaria verna ssp. verna i.e. the type species. However, I believe that, according to Sell (1994), it is only two subspecies of F. verna that form bulbils, i.e. ssp. ficariiformis and ssp. bulbilifer. See this article for details. I can't distinguish between the two: consulting the key in this article, the distinguishing features between the two subspecies seem to be size (which I find varies considerably, even in the same cultivar, depending on the growing conditions and aspect). SiGarb (talk) 21:18, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
—

(untitled comment by User:NicolasGrandjean)[edit]

About this picture, we (Halvard& me) think that this is the female of Lycaena tityrus, not L. virgaureae. --NicolasGrandjean (talk) 22:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentification of Image:Medicago_lupulina_kz1.jpg[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

Your photograph Image:Medicago_lupulina_kz1.jpg does not show Medicago lupulina but a Trifolium species. The flowers of Medicago lupulina look quite different (see e. g. Image:MedicagoLupulina.jpg) and the stalks of the individual flowers are very short so that the inflorescence looks more compact than an inflorescence of a similar Trifolium species. I added a remark in the index page and also in the image discussion page. I suggest that you move your image to Category:Unidentified_Trifolium and rename it accordingly. Robert Flogaus-Faust 62.134.80.10 22:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

opem być[edit]

Witam. Probówałem znaleźć email do Ciebie, ale chyba go nie podałeś w preferencjach pl.Wiki i piszę tu. Mimo wielu propozycji do Ciebie chciałbym ponowić prośbę byś rozważył otrzymanie przycisków na pl.Wiki. Twój wkład jest spory, jest regularny a bycie sysopem na pewno ułatwiłoby Ci pracę. Nie wiem czy wyobrażasz sobie pracę administratora jako osoby, która niesamowicie ciężko pracuje, ale to tylko wynika z nazwy tej funkcji. Bycie sysopem jest po prostu ułatwieniem twojej pracy na Wikipedii, która jest regularna i spora jak na resztę wikipedystów. Pragnę Ci przypomnieć słowa adminship is not big deal, a także aktywny i godny zaufania uczestnik projektu, który pomaga innym. Masz spory elektorat i zaufanie społeczności. To ty przedstawiałeś chłodne nastawienie i pomoc w moim początkach edytorskich jakimi były dyskusje PDA i PAnM. Chciałbym Ciebie zgłosić na PUA na pl.Wiki, jeśli uważasz że rekomendacja nie powinna wyjść ode mnie to ja już widzę las rąk. Przemyśl moje słowa i pamiętaj że bycie adminem ma Ci pomóc, a nie być twoim brzemieniem. Oferuję także swoją pomoc jeśli byś chciał. JDavid (talk) 12:04, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Kenraiz!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polygonum amphibium several.jpg[edit]

Why isn't this Polygonum amphibium? And do you think it is, then? – Tintazul talk 23:37, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Kenraiz,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:42, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thyrsopteris elegans kz.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Parthenocissus quinquefolia[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

Are sure that this and the other pictures like this are not Parthenocissus quinquefolia? What made you to believe that they were missidentified?

Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you for the explanation. Then, could you recognize the specie? DenesFeri (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Easter[edit]

I wish you Happy Easter! DenesFeri (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION[edit]

Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting a photo in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use it in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the picture will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The photo which I would use is:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Akebia_gui_kz.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com


Bye,

Edoardo

Location?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz - do you have a photo location for File:Rhamnus cath kz.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! - MPF (talk) 09:04, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also for File:Trichomanes speciosum kz1.jpg and File:Trichomanes speciosum kz2.jpg, please (it doesn't need to be exact, if you're concerned about the conservation safety of the specimens). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. odder (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

File:Boraginaceae - Myosotis stricta - London 1.jpg[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

Are you sure that those pictures, don't present Myosotis stricta? And if they really don't, than do you have an idea that what could they be? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. DenesFeri (talk) 11:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monkeyflower, OR Coast Range.JPG[edit]

Oops. I was pretty sure it was a monkeyflower species. Thanks for the correction. Jsayre64 (talk) 23:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Kenraiz,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo[edit]

Hi Kenraiz, for images taken in the Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo, please use this category as well! -- Ies (talk) 15:34, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have hundreds pictures made there. To category Jardín Botánico I have put pictures which present views garden or somehow its specific parts. I do not think that photos only with plants and their parts are usefull in garden category. Especially that plant photos are not separated from photos which presents garden. Kenraiz (talk) 15:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I have to disagree. On the contrary it's very informatic and useful to see what certain plant species are grown in a certain Botanical Garden. (Personally, I visited several Botanical Gardens only because I read or heared that for me interesting plants (succulent plants and Euphorbiaceae) are grown there.) Therefore I established Category:Plants in Jardín Botánico Canario Viera y Clavijo‎ and hope that you use it for all your images of plants taken there. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 16:19, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia[edit]

Cześć!

Zauważyłem, że pisałeś gdzieś na Wikipedii, że wybierasz się w tym roku do Armenii. Dość dobrze zwiedziłem ten bardzo ciekawy kraj w roku 2014, więc jakbyś miał jakieś pytania co do podróży czy kraju, to śmiało pytaj, chętnie odpowiem i pomogę:) Pod tym adresem zaś znajdziesz wrzucane przeze mnie fotki z Armenii (jeszcze nie wszystkie wrzuciłem, na razie tkwię przy fotkach z Górskiego Karabachu): Category:Images of Armenia by Hons084 (Halavar) --Halavar (talk) 12:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mnie osobiście urzekły dwie prowincje, Jeghegnadzor i Sjunik, czyli południowo-wschodnie prowincje, ze wspaniałymi krajobrazami. W Azerbejdżanie (a więc też w Nachiczewanie) nie byłem, bo tam trzeba wizę, które bardzo trudno dostać. Azerowie strasznie utrudniają przez formalności wjazd do swojego kraju. Z kolei wjazd do Górskiego Karabachu jest bardzo prosty. Z miasta Goris odjeżdżają minibusy (marszrutki) do Stepanakertu. Na granicy, wysiadacie i dostajecie karteczkę wjazdu na teren Republiki Górskiego Karabachu, którą musisz zachować. Następnie w ciągu 3 dni musisz zgłosić się w Stepanakercie do tego budynku: File:2014 Stepanakert, Budynek Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (02).jpg czyli Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych, wypełnić formularz wizowy, zapłacić 3000 AMD (za wizę do 10 dni) i poczekać kilkanaście minut. Możesz wybrać, czy chcesz mieć wklejoną wizę do paszportu (a więc dzięki temu nie wjedziesz już do Azerbejdżanu aż do końca ważności Twojego paszportu) czy też na osobnej kartce, którą po wyjeździe z Górskiego Karabachu możesz sobie zatrzymać na pamiątkę. Górski Karabach w zasadzie niczym nie różni się od Armenii. Jeśli lubisz przyrodę, to gorąco polecam jedyny znakowany w tym kraju pieszy szlak turystyczny Janapar Trail: http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?type=relation&id=3668100&map=11!39.7215!46.8448 (znakowałem go na OSM). Aha, jeśli nie znasz języka rosyjskiego, to polecam się poduczyć przez wyjazdem podstawowych zwrotów, bo z angielskim tam słabo (zarówno w Górskim Karabachu jak i Armenii, no może poza stolicą). Ludzie są bardzo mili, przyjaźni i pomocni, spędziłem tam 3 tygodnie i ani razu nie było najmniejszych nieprzyjemności. Armenia jest bardzo tania, tańsza niż Gruzja, więc pieniędzy zbyt dużo nie wydacie. Wszystko jest bardzo tanie, noclegi, przejazdy, wstępy, jedzenie i picie a to duży plus. Mam spisane różne ceny, więc jak coś cię interesuje, to mogę podać co ile kosztowało. Gdy będziesz w prowincji Sjunik to polecam spróbować oghi, czyli mocnej wódki robionej z owoców morwy, a więc z tego: File:2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar, Morwa biała (02).jpg File:2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar, Morwa biała (01).jpg. Pozdrawiam --Halavar (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

request non-commercial use of images[edit]

Good morning Kenraiz:

I've seen https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quercus_robur_fl_kz1.jpg pretty pictures. I wonder if I might use photography Flower Quercus robur for a small non-profit publication, of course the source of the proceeding would be mentioned.

Greetings,

My name is Eduardo, I Pontevedra, Galicia, Spain.

Sedum spurium, Phedimus spurius or Sedum acre?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

You say that this is not Sedum acre, but Sedum spurium File:Saxifragales - Sedum spurium - 1.jpg; but it is now in the Phedimus spurius category. Why? Which is the accepted name, and which the synonym? What about this File:Sedum acre - Transylvania 1.jpg? The 2 pictures show the same sp. and even the same specimen. So the second picture also show Sedum spurium? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And I believe this are some Saxifragales. Do you agree? And can you tell me there sp.? DenesFeri (talk) 10:55, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DenesFeri (talk) 09:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sedum maximum or Hylotelephium maximum[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

The Sedum maximum and Hylotelephium maximum are the same plant, are they synonyms? Or they are 2 different plants? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 12:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please answer, if you can. DenesFeri (talk) 07:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. DenesFeri (talk) 09:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boloria euphrosyne kz.jpg[edit]

Hello, I just want to inform you that this picture actually shows Boloria selene. Can you please make the correction ?--LamBoet (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit (Batumi Botanical Garden)[edit]

Hi! I reverted your edit because, the picture shows plants even if it can not be identified! Thank you for your cooperation. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 09:42, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Batumi Botanical Garden. I agree with you, but still there is a question how can we categorizing these type pics. My guess was (maybe) 'Unidentified plants in Batumi Botanical Garden' or something similar. - - Globetrotter19 (talk) 10:45, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-phylles 2017[edit]

Hi Kenraiz,

I just found lots of interesting pictures on your pages.

I suggest you have a look to my website http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

We would be honoured if you accept to participate! It's completely free.

Best regards Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC) (administrator of the french Wikibooks)

"Pinus wangii var. wilsonii" in the San Francisco Botanical Garden[edit]

Hi Ken - did the SF BG give any info on this? The name is not validly published, and the specimen in the photo is Pinus parviflora, not P. wangii. My guess is that the SF BG was given the plant by a nursery, and that the nursery invented a "new" plant as a sales tactic (i.e., the BG is a victim of advertising fraud by the nursery). - MPF (talk) 11:10, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've got cones of both species in my herbarium, so can spot the difference ;-) MPF (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Begonia obliqua[edit]

Hi Kenraiz, can you verified that both files in Category:Begonia obliqua are of this very species, because they look very diferent from the type specimen. --Salix (talk) 15:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kenraiz. One should never have confidence in a botanical garden's label without checking the species afterwards... --Salix (talk) 21:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing serious ! It may happen to anybody, including me . --Salix (talk) 09:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File renaming reason[edit]

Hello, you’ve requested the renaming of several files showing Paronychia argentea exemplars. I followed your requests, but you should in future be careful, which renaming reason you select. This time it was number 3 "error in filename", and this was clearly wrong. Instead you should have chosen reason number 2 "meaningless or ambiguous filename" or (this time even better, but I noticed it too late) reason number 1, because you have uploaded the files. (Side remark: If you want to add some files to this series of "Paronychia argentea kz…", start with number 14: For whatever reason you had left out no. 11, so I shifted the last 3 files one down.) — Speravir – 00:29, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iberis sempervirens 'Schneeflocke' or Iberis sempervirens 'Snowflake'[edit]

Hello Kenraiz,

Bitte entschuldige, dass ich auf Deutsch schreibe. Aber wenn ich mit meinen schlechten Englischkentnissen Google-Translator nutze, dann kann es zu Missverständnissen führen.

Meine Fragen an Dich: Du hast die Kategorie Category:Iberis sempervirens 'Schneeflocke' angelegt. Ein Benutzer hat viele Bilder mit dem Namen 'Snowball' hochgeladen ([1]). Sind beide identisch ([2] und [3])? Welchen Namen würdest Du vorschlagen, den deutschen oder den englischen? Für den anderen wird dann natürlich eine Weiterleitung eingerichtet. Der Benutzer hat mehr als 34.000 Fotos von Pflanzen hochgeladen. Sehr, sehr viele Bilder von Pflanzensorten. Ich habe bisher die Sorten nur in vorhandene Kategorien einsortiert oder neue erstellt, wenn ich den Namen der Sorte in der wissenschaftlichen Literatur fand. Ansonsten habe ich die Fotos erst einmal in die Oberkategorien einsortiert (Art oder Gattung). Hast Du noch einen Hinweis für mich, wie man Pflanzensorten leichter finden kann? Vielen Dank im Voraus und mit freundlichen Grüßen, Hystrix (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Please excuse me for writing in German. But if I use Google Translator with my bad English skills, then it can lead to misunderstandings.

My questions to you: You have created the category Category:Iberis sempervirens 'Schneeflocke'. A user has uploaded many pictures with the name 'Snowball' ([4]). Are both identical ([5] and [6])? What name would you suggest the German or the English? For the other, of course, a redirect is established. The user has uploaded more than 34,000 photos of plants. Very, very many pictures of plant varieties. I have so far sorted the varieties only into existing categories or created new ones when I found the name of the variety in the scientific literature. Otherwise, I have the photos only once sorted into the top categories (species or genus). Do you still have a hint for me how to find plant cultivations easier? Thanks in advance and sincerely, Hystrix (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Category:Nothofagus antarctica[edit]

Ten gatunek był opisany jako Nothofagus × alpina. Na The Plant List są:

  • Nothofagus alpina (Poepp. ex A. DC.) Oerst. – osobny gatunek
  • Nothofagus × alpina (Poepp. ex A. DC.) Oerst. – synonim Nothofagus antarctica

Założyłem, że skoro jest znak "×", to będzie to synonim. Może będzie to jednak Nothofagus alpina? Tournasol7 (talk) 08:11, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ehrharta diplax[edit]

✓ Done, Tournasol7 (talk) 09:56, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Araucaria araucana subcategories[edit]

Hi @Kenraiz and Salicyna: - you recently created a number of new subcategories in Category:Araucaria araucana. This has unfortunately resulted in serious loss of important information, whereby all natural occurrence specimens were in the root category, and all cultivated specimens were in Category:Araucaria araucana (cultivated) or subcategories thereof. Your recategorising has wrecked this important separation, making it impossible for users to know whether a photo is of wild specimens or not, without detailed examination of the image text. Please undo this mess so that the natural and the cultivated are separated again. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 00:24, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And ditto Araucaria heterophylla, and any other species categories to be messed up in this way - MPF (talk) 00:33, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cakile maritima[edit]

Hi Kenraiz - apologies for the miscategorisation of these 3! I'd assumed that all in the sequence File:Cakile maritima kz1.jpg - File:Cakile maritima kz9.jpg were part of one set all from the same location. It helps a lot if the file names include the location, then this wouldn't happen so easily ;-) MPF (talk) 00:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Misidentified images of Hippocrepis[edit]

Hi Kenraiz, I found the three photographs above in Category:Hippocrepis multisiliquosa. However, these images cannot show Hippocrepis multisiliquosa, because the fruits of your species have their "holes" on the inner side of the arcs that the fruits form (the convex side), whereas real Hippocrepis multisiliquosa has the "holes" on the outer side (the concave side), see e.g. my photograph File:Hippocrepis multisiliquosa RF.jpg and also File:Horseshoe plant on Malta.jpg. I found this (in other words) both in the Flora Europaea and in a German language flora of Crete (Jahn/Schönfelder, Exkursionsflora für Kreta) and also got it explained to me by the botanist who told me the ID of my photograph in a German botany forum, https://forum.pflanzenbestimmung.de/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36541 . So assuming that the species given at the site http://www.flora-of-cyprus.eu/ are complete, your plant must be Hippocrepis ciliata. The large papillae on the fruits also nicely match Hipocrepis ciliata, whereas Hippocrepis multisiliquosa should have small or no papillae on the fruits according to Flora Europaea. And this is something that might mean that the image of Hipocrepis multisiliquosa on http://www.flora-of-cyprus.eu/cdm_dataportal/taxon/98b7ba31-7e63-4483-b5ec-d73b65dd6352 might actually also show a different species. Anyway, your Hipocrepis was clearly misidentified and I am going to change this. If you do not disagree, we should also have the photographs renamed to avoid any confusion. With best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 12:34, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright pictures[edit]

Dear author,

we would like to use the following pictures for a biodiversity handout to train and inform farmers in the field of biodiversity:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trifolium_dubium_kz1.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aphanes_arvensis_kz1.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Trifolium_dubium_kz1.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lathyrus_paluster1.jpg

Your name along with a link to the original file and the creative common license will be named in the pictures index (sorted by page number and order of pictures). Although the creative common license does allow the use of the pictures for our purpose, I wanted to make sure you are also fine with us using them.

I would be very grateful if you could give me a short answer.

Kind regards,

Ulrike Harant

identity[edit]

Hi Krzysztof - sadly, all your photos which you'd added at Cupressus atlantica are actually C. glabra, which is an invasive exotic species in Morocco. Note the thicker, more angular and more strongly glaucous shoots, and cones with just 6 scales (8-12 in C. atlantica); for the true species, compare here (pp. 78-96) and here. I'll reclassify & rename the photos shortly. - MPF (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Unfortunate that you missed the real thing; you need to go up the road to the Tizi-n-test pass, hope you get another opportunity. MPF (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not Watsonia coccinea but Hesperantha coccinea?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz, Your two files, Image:Watsonia_coccinea_kz1.jpg and Image:Watsonia_coccinea_kz2.jpg, uploaded on 24 December 2016, in my opinion depict Hesperantha coccinea (=Schizostylis coccinea). Have taken the liberty to move the two images to Hesperantha coccinea. If you agree with this identification, you may want to consider changing the file names as well. Best regards, SAplants (talk) 13:47, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Petasites frigidus[edit]

Dziękuję za identyfikację, zaraz poprawię. Pstrykam wszystko to, co mnie zaciekawi. W przypadku roślin czy owadów często mam duże problemy z identyfikacją, n.p. wierzby na Grenlandii, rośliny Alaski czy Spitsbergenu. Nie jestem też pewien identyfikacji roślin Krety (chociaż w tym przypadku dużą pomocą była grupa "Flowers of Crete'). Jeszcze raz dziękuję i pozdrawiam Jerzystrzelecki (talk) 16:45, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Identity of "File:Watsonia stenosiphon kz1.jpg"[edit]

Hi Kenraiz, On 30 December 2017 you uploaded an image of a pink-flowered member of Watsonia (Iridaceae) taken in the Auckland Botanic Gardens, and filed it under Watsonia stenosiphon. This is an obvious misidentification, presumably based on (as unfortunately is so often the case) an incorrect label in the garden. Watsonia stenosiphon is a relatively small plant with bright orange flowers. The pink-flowered watsonias are particularly difficult to identify from photographs, a task made even more difficult by the existence of garden cultivars. However, I suspect your plant may well be a form of the widely grown Watsonia borbonica (= W. pyramidata). You may want to use the latter name for the image, or move it to Unidentified Watsonia. Best regards, SAplants (talk) 07:24, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Category:Rubus schmidelioides[edit]

Faktycznie wygląda jak Phyllocladus alpinus, który dziś dodawałem z innej lokalizacji :) Poprawił opis i kategorię, no i zgłosiłem nazwę pliku do zmiany. Szczerze ze zdjęć roślin nie jestem zadowolony, szczególnie z tych robionych z bliska, gdzie ważne jest ukazanie detali. Z kolei Twoje zdjęcia wyszły znakomicie!

Postanowiłem sobie, że w końcu prześlę wszystkie zdjęcia z Nowej Zelandii; zostało mi się jeszcze kilka dni... Przy oznaczaniu gatunków często wzoruję się na twoich zdjęciach, ale i tak sporo fotek roślin chyba nie uda się ustalić. Tournasol7 (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Siewki[edit]

Cześć, rzeczywiście ogród wrocławski jest świetny, odwiedzam go od lat, a nadal znajduję coś nowego. Wybieram się niedługo do Bratysławy i mam nadzieję odwiedzić tamten ogród. O podręczniku w Wikibooks wiem, zauwżyłam pojawiające się podkategorie ze zdjęciami siewek i trafiłam po wykorzystaniu plików. Świetny pomysł, bo pokazuje etap wzrostu, którego praktycznie nie ma w typowych atlasach roślin. Będę pamiętać i zwrócę uwagę także na siewki podczas wizyt w ogrodzie. Na pewno przyda się żebyś miał ten mój wkład na oku, bo nie mam "opatrzonej" tej formy, a na tabliczkach zdarzaja się błędy. Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 06:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


[7][edit]

Hi, I did Category:Baum 12 to Aesculus parviflora]] Baummapper (talk) 16:51,

Krzysztofie! W odpowiedzi na Twoją wiadomość skierowaną bezpośrednio do mnie i zarzuty, że niewłaściwie wykorzystuję Wikimedię oraz że moje fotki są nieużyteczne i niepotrzebnie zajmują czas zarówno mnie jak i innym, chciałbym Ci także coś napisać. Z tego co wiem jesteś człowiekiem po studiach, masz dość wysoką pozycję społeczną a także stać Cię na drogi sprzęt fotograficzny. Zdecydowanie brak Ci jednak wyrozumiałości i szacunku dla pasji innych osób zajmujących się fotografią. Obejrzałem dużo Twoich dzieł imam mieszane uczucia. Twoje zdjęcia są wspaniałe technicznie i za to masz u mnie plus! Są one jednak bardzo monotematyczne i za wyjątkiem niewielkiej grupy miłośników przyrody nie cieszą się wielkim zainteresowaniem. Weź to pod uwagę, zanim zaczniesz krytykować innych. Moje prace są skromne technicznie lecz w bardzo dużej ilości są wykorzystywane do ilustrowania wielu miejscowości w Polsce i za granicą. Mnie najbardziej interesuje turystyka i kolejnictwo i temu poświęcam czas oraz swój lichy sprzęt. Nigdy na forum nie krytykuję czyichś prac, nawet kiedy mi się nie podobają. Widziałem wiele autentycznych "gniotów" i jakoś nie przyszło mi na myśl aby je wyśmiewać. Rozumiem, że każdy z nas ma inne upodobania i możliwości. Dla mnie liczy się pasja i chęć pokazania innym swoich zainteresowań. Ja jestem człowiekiem 73-letnim i mocno schorowanym. Jestem także mniej majętny od Ciebie. Ciebie stać na wycieczki po świecie a mnie co najwyżej po Polsce i Europie i to tylko tanimi liniami lotniczymi. Trudno mi poruszać się w internecie i dlatego mam kłopot z kategoryzowaniem i szczegółowym opisem zdjęć. Cieszy mnie jednak każda moja fotka, którą zobaczę w Wikipedii a jest ich naprawdę bardzo dużo. Sporo moich zdjęć zostało usuniętych przez społeczność ale jest to maleńki procent w stosunku do ich ilości. Z Twoimi zdjęciami jest podobnie! Na koniec chciałbym życzyć Ci większej empatii. Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie! Antekbojar

Location?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz - do you have a more detailed location for File:Juniperus cedrus kz5.JPG, please? In particular, was it of a natural wild specimen, or a cultivated plant? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have added some more detailed information about location of specimen. I am not sure whether it was cultivated specimen or not - there was a mixture of some ornamental shrubs (different species) close to the path and wild on slopes of hill. It is native species there. Kenraiz (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, thanks! At that altitude (630 m), it will be cultivated; the species occurs naturally only at higher altitudes (mostly around 2,000-2,200 m, rarely down to about 1,000 m). I had hoped you might have taken the photo higher above El Tanque, rather than below :-) - MPF (talk) 22:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sortkey usage and DEFAULTSORT[edit]

Hello, and first off, thank you for helping out with the rose cultivars! It's a huge mess to manage, almost as much work as an actual rose garden. I noticed you'd added some sortkeys that aren't up to code. Fortunately, it's a small thing that's easy to fix.

  • Sortkeys shall have no diacritics, ligatures, or punctiation--naked letters only
  • Þórsmörk -> Thorsmork
  • æ -> ae
  • {{DEFAULTSORT}} sets a default sortkey which will be used for all categories that don't have an individual sortkey. The template goes above the categories in site code.
  • e.g. François Fancyboy Poshington-Plentyofwealth III -> {{DEFAULTSORT:Poshington Plentyofwealth, Francois Fancyboy 3}}
  • or Rosa 'Honeycakes '89' -> {{DEFAULTSORT:Honeycakes 89}}
  • or Rosa 'Darling' (1966) -> {{DEFAULTSORT:Darling 1966}}.

Most importantly: naked letters for sortkeys! If you have any questions, feel free to ask me anything on my talkpage or {{Ping}} me in a discussion elsewhere. I'm not always active, but I check Commons almost daily.

(p.s. "it's pronounced plenuf" :) --Pitke (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Copyright status: File:Silene noctiflora 84171800.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Silene noctiflora 84171800.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Silene noctiflora 84171800.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:05, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


File tagging File:Pseudolycopodiella serpentina inat2.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pseudolycopodiella serpentina inat2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pseudolycopodiella serpentina inat2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Bot license review not passed: iNaturalist author is using Cc-by-nc-4.0: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/56517188. This action was performed automatically by INaturalistReviewBot (talk) 07:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kuklik bułgarski[edit]

Cześć, w kategorii Category:Geum bulgaricum jest kilka Twoich zdjęć kuklika zrobionych w Cluj-Napoca Botanical Garden, np. File:Geum bulgaricum kz01.jpg - czy może to być jednak Geum rivale a nie Geum bulgaricum? Kolor kwiatu i łodyg pasuje do tego pierwszego. Zerknij na zdjęcia kuklików na tej stronie. Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. Ten kuklik był ogólnie jakiś pechowy, prawie połowę zdjęć przerzuciłam gdzie indziej. Nova (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--15:55, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cardamine pratensis[edit]

Ok, dzieki za wylapanie bledu. Postaram sie poprawic jeszcze dzisiaj. Tournasol7 (talk) 18:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Begonia brachypoda ?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz. It looks like there has been a confusion of species in Botanischen Garten Berlin. The files in Category:Begonia brachypoda are very different from the original description : too many flowers and much bigger leaves. I happens that labels are mixed up. Do you have a possibility to go back to the place and ask for an explanation ? --Begalma (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have right - the plants does not match the description of species. I wish I will be there again in this year, so I will try to find somebody to ask about it. Kenraiz (talk) 21:41, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tetragonia tetragonioides czy tetragonoides?[edit]

Hej, znalazłam to Twoje zdjęcie z ogrodu wrocławskiego, opisane jako Tetragonia tetragonioides, zgodnie zresztą z plakietką w ogrodzie, kategoria też jest pod tą nazwą. Z kolei nazwy Tetragonia tetragonoides używa: Wikispecies, systematyka w kategorii Category:Tetragonia czy POWO. W artykułach w Wikipedii jest różnie. Która nazwa jest właściwa? Nova (talk) 16:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. Zgłosiłam na kontakt POWO, może poprawią. U nas też praktycznie wszystko do poprawy :-( Nova (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hej, odesłali mnie do ICN Art 60.EX 39 https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php gdzie stoi: "Ex. 39. Tetragonia tetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze (Revis. Gen. Pl. 1: 264. 1891) was based on Demidovia tetragonoides Pall. (Enum. Hort. Demidof: 150. 1781), the specific epithet of which was derived from the generic name Tetragonia and the suffix ‑oides. Because this is a compound epithet derived from a noun and a suffix, not two Greek or Latin words, it is not to be altered to ‘tetragonioides’." Nova (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No to trochę nie na temat odpowiedzieli, jakby nie zauważyli, że Kuntze opublikował nazwę tetragoniodes, a nie tetragonoides (jak w cytacie wyżej). Pewnie zrobił literówkę, ale wypadałoby ją odnotować przy uściśleniu nazwy. Tak czy siak, obowiązuje zacytowana wykładnia Kodeksu. Kenraiz (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Solanum vs. Jaltomata[edit]

Hej, znalazłam kilka Twoich zdjęć Solanum scabrum, np. File:Solanum scabrum kz04.jpg i zastanowiło mnie czy z kolei kilka moich starszych nie jest źle sklasyfikowanych jako Jaltomata procumbens, np. File:Jaltomata procumbens Jaltomata rozesłana 2018-09-02 01.jpg. Na tabliczce z OB UWr mam Jaltomata procumbens, ale znalazłam też moje nowsze zdjęcia i owoce są bardziej podobne do tego. Jak sądzisz? Pozdrawiam, Nova (talk) 07:30, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za potwierdzenie. Wrzuciłam niezbyt dobre, ale faktyczne zdjęcia jaltomaty, np. to. Zawnioskuję o zmianę nazwy tych poprzednich. Nova (talk) 10:20, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Une chèvre pour vous ![edit]

Naprawdę doceniam twoje zdjęcia roślin, których regularnie używam do zilustrowania francuskiego Wikisłownika.

BACHELOT Pierre J-P 17:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sedum griseum ?[edit]

Hi Kenraiz. I've seen your photo Sedum griseum kz01 and I think, a Sedum I found on my green roof could be the same. Would you agree? Greetings from Ruhland --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 06:52, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR: . Yes, it looks like the same species and, as I see in Google, this species is used in green roofs. Kenraiz (talk) 13:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, whish you to have a good week --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But I have an additional question: have you found any trade or common name? (I've seen somewhat like spanish wallpepper = Sedum hispanicum, which imho could not be perennial; beside this I've found only names for similiar looking plants, hybrids, predicted as blooming pink). --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 20:48, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR: , you have right. Sedum griseum looks different. I am not sure which species was wrongly labelled in botanical garden in Gottingen so I removed my photos to "unidentified Sedum". In description I added that it is probably S. hispanicum. Kenraiz (talk) 18:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, unless that this was not my goal, S. hispanicum (in my honest opinion) not fits your, my and the cited photos. I found the species S. hispanicum here, too, and it grows from seedlings and was blooming in the second year, and never it was perennial. The unfortunately mentioned "trade names" with reference to this species seem to be wrong, anyway. S. hispanicum is unuseful for green roofs - if merchants declare here plants so (as I found), it must be false. My citations of pink blooming hybrids can't be whether be your, nor my photos - they where the only names I found and therefor I asked for your Google-discoveries.
And my question mark means my (not your) photos. We have photos from two botanical gardens, looking different, and don't know, if it is the same species or, what is the right. We don't have photos of blooming S. griseum here (accept yours).
In Göttingen are
      • an "Old botanical garden"
      • an "Forest-botanical garden"
      • an "Experimental botanical garden"
I think your photos are taken in the first named, aren't they? So I can ask there and hope for clearance (if not you have a better contact there, from a photo permission, e.g.).
And: What names and may be photos, especial blooming, have you found used as "S. griseum" for green roofs? Best regards --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 22:21, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

«Вікі любить Землю» 2023 в Україні проходить з 1 по 31 липня[edit]

Доброго дня!

Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — Вікі любить Землю повернувся! Цього року конкурс відбувається протягом липня.

Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.

Загальний формат конкурсу такий же, як у минулі роки. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Facebook, Instagram або в блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.

Важливо! З міркувань національної безпеки та безпеки учасників і учасниць до участі у конкурсі допускаються тільки фото та відео, зроблені до 23 лютого 2022 року включно!

Рекомендуємо уважно ознайомитись з правилами конкурсу та звернути увагу на вимоги щодо якості фотографій. Цьогоріч мінімальна роздільна здатність фотографій, які приймаються на конкурс, становить 2 Мп.

Сподіваємося на вашу участь у липні!

Kolorki występowania[edit]

Cześć. Trafiłem na W opisie jest: jasnopomarańczowy - gatunek rzadki; pomarańczowy - gatunek nierzadki; ciemnopomarańczowy - gatunek pospolity. I za cholerę nie wiem, które z tych pomarańczowych są na tym rysunku. nie lepiej zrobić np. żółte, zielone, czerwone, niebieskie? Chrumps (talk) 16:55, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Chrumps: Masz rację. Gdy zobaczy się więcej mapek rzecz staje się czytelniejsza – Category:Flora distribution maps of Poland, ale pojedyncze mają niejednoznaczną legendę (jeśli nie ma wszystkich trzech barw na mapie). Tyle, że mapki nie są do wykorzystania w pojedynkę – do Wikipedii ich nie daję, bo boję się o zarzut polonocentryzmu. Mapki były przygotowywane do Atlasu flory Polski (wikibooks), ale ponieważ ten projekt zaczął się sypać (jest tam jeden admin, który wymienił całe oprogramowanie...) to wszystko porzuciłem. Kenraiz (talk) 17:10, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • No tak, ale natknąłem się na taką mapkę w pl:Pyleniec_pospolity (i tylko tam jest używana), a tam żadnej legendy i nie wiadomo, o co chodzi, a z opis kolorów Commons dużo nie pomaga. Chyba trzeba dać legendę kolorkową w artykule - jeast chyba jakiś szablon do kolorków w kwadracikach, jeśli dobrze pamiętam, ale nie wiem jaki. Chrumps (talk) 17:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cirsium palustre seedlings[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MediaSearch&search=seedlings+Kenraiz+Cirsium+palustre&fulltext=Search&type=image

the shape of cotyledons seems different BubikolRamios (talk) 06:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@BubikolRamios: Yes, but there was no another Cirsium in vicinity. Shape of cotyledons is often variable depending on light conditions. In sun they are often thick and short, in dark elongated and thin (the photos from Jamno were taken in alder forest). The similar situation is then seedling grows in nature and in glasshouse. Kenraiz (talk) 07:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for inf. BubikolRamios (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ranunculus acris seedling[edit]

check last cotyledon vs. previous: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:MediaSearch&search=seedlings+Kenraiz+ranunculus+acris&fulltext=Search&type=image BubikolRamios (talk) 07:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».10:17, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Вікі любить пам'ятки 2023 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2023 in Ukraine[edit]

Привіт!

З 1 по 31 жовтня буде проходити українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України. Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут.

Окрім основних номінацій у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій: «Відео», «Війна руйнує пам'ятки», «Елементи екстер'єру», «Єврейська спадщина», «Інтер'єри», «Німецька спадщина», «Фотоплівка» та «Визначні місця Харкова».

Важливо! Через російське вторгнення в Україну також довелося змінити умови: у більшості випадків тільки роботи зняті до 30 червня 2023 року включно будуть прийматися на конкурс.

Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читайте тут. -- Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».10:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів). Якщо Ви не хочете більше отримувати повідомлень про конкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки», додайте свою сторінку користувача до відповідної категорії чи напишіть Оргкомітету. Дякуємо!

You have received this message, because you had uploaded pictures to one of the contests of Wikimedia Ukraine or helped (for example, edited files from these contests). If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in the contest, you can check out our page in English here. If you do not want to receive messages related to Wiki Loves Monuments — add your user page to this category or write to the Organising team. Thank you!

Caucalis platycarpos vs. Orlaya daucoides[edit]

Hej, mam kilka zdjęć z OB UWr z tabliczką Caucalis platycarpos L., ale przy próbie weryfikacji czy jest to poprawne oznaczenie natknęłam się na Orlaya daucoides, wydzielone z C.p. W PoWO są dwa rekordy C.p. L., jeden zaakceptowany, drugi niepoprawny uznany za synonim O.d. Równocześnie ilustracja, która na Commons jest w kategorii C.p., w PoWO jest w rekordzie O.d. ... Obie kategorie na Commons zawierają zdjęcia, jedna także ilustracje botaniczne, ale przy tym zamieszaniu i historii tych taksonów, kategoryzacja staje się mało wiarygodna. Czy znasz źródło podające cechy, po których można je rozróżnić, lub jakieś wiarygodne ilustracje/zdjęcia do porównania w nowym ujęciu? Nova (talk) 11:08, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. Nova (talk) 16:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2023[edit]

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa 'Mevrouw Henri Daendels'[edit]

Rosa 'Mevrouw Henri Daendels'

Hi Kenraiz,

For the article G.A.H. Buisman & Zoon in the Dutch Wikipedia, I used rose photos of yours. With the photo of Rosa 'Mevrouw Henri Daendels' it seems to me that the photo is rotated 90 degrees. Is that correct, could you have a look at that?

Regards Wilrooij (talk) 17:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lonicera periclymenum[edit]

good day.does this lonicera it grow in greece and turkey? Thank you for answer in advance 5.197.252.46 13:38, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i mean does lonicera periclymenum grow in wild nature? Are greece and turkey native range of this plant? 5.197.252.46 13:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is easy to check on the site POWO. In Greece yes – is native (but only in the most NW part [8]), in Turkey not. The more common are L. etrusca and L. caprifolium there. Kenraiz (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lycium depressum[edit]

The images in this name are incorrect. The plant in the picture is not Lycium depressum Ariesaada (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ariesaada: Thanks. It was labeled as Lycium depressum but in fact it is not similar to pictures of species from natural stands. Maybe it was mistake made by botanical garden staff. I do not exclude that identification is correct but plant does not look typically because of influence of different (fertile) habitat and climate. I have removed pictures to 'Unidentified Lycium' folder. Kenraiz (talk) 07:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C[edit]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

I needed some pictures from the San Francisco Botanical Garden around 2017 for an article, and I wasn't expecting much but came across the many, many, many photos you uploaded. Just wanted to give you my thanks for sharing those. hinnk (talk) 20:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kenraiz&oldid=879887708"