User talk:Arcalino

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Arcalino!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:58, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Bruegge View from Rozenhoedkaai.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bruegge View from Rozenhoedkaai.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your current Commons picture canidate[edit]

Hello I fixed your image at [1] I removed the unessary brackets for you.TucsonDavidU.S.A. 18:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My FP Canidate[edit]

I was just wondering if you would consider support my picture as a FP candidate, I had to fix it and that deleted it. Here is the link http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/_File:U.S._Army_Apache_AH-64D_LongBow.jpg Thanks TucsonDavidU.S.A. 17:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I´m sorry, according to the rules of commons I still can not vote due to lower contributions to Commons. Arcalino (talk) , 20:54, 12 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

VIS Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Rio-Andirio Bridge construction .

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Rio-Andirio Bridge construction .
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Please see my talk page for a message. Thanks - Godot13 (talk) 06:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

VIS Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: The fossil cliffs of Steigerberg.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
The fossil cliffs of Steigerberg.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maeuseturm Burg Ehrenfels Bingen Rhein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could do with some sharpening IMHO but QI anyway. --Kreuzschnabel 21:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann Sebastian Bach in Weimar Bueste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good although I didn't understand the crop on the right --Poco a poco 15:11, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you voted at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - September 2006-2.jpg. But according to our policy "Two different versions of the same picture cannot both be featured". So please vote accordingly at Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Clock Tower - Palace of Westminster, London - September 2006.jpg too. JKadavoor Jee 04:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Path, tree, bridge in the northern Palatinate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

QI Discussion[edit]

Hi mate. You don't have to move images to discuss yourself - just change the /Nomination to /Discuss and QICBot will do it when it next runs. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:27, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nerobergtempel Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fine image. --Kreuzschnabel 09:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurfuerstliche Burg Eltville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment a bit Unsharpness --Rjcastillo 17:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done fixed it --Arcalino 07:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC) Support now OK --Rjcastillo 17:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caparica, sun covered parking near the beach with cyclist.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktkirche Wiesbaden von Süden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm auf dem Neroberg wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 17:15, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for comments and suggestion[edit]

Hi Arcalino, I've corrected the image Beyond the sea is my home.JPG following your comments in Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/candidate_list.
As for the lower back too dark, I tried quite a stark contrast to symbolize the pain and discomfort of man.
Thanks again for your competent and experienced suggestions. --Franciaio (talk) 07:13, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mainz Theodor-Heuss-Bruecke blaue Stunde Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support very nice --A.Savin 17:58, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Portal der Kirche St. Engelbert in St. Ingbert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:02, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

D800[edit]

Hi Arcalino, I promoted one of your images which has some minor flaws like CA and unsharpness on the top of the "Turm" but for me the image is good. I noticed that with higher F values, you used f/5.6, you get much lesser CA and obviously DOF which you need for tall structures. Best regards und Grüße aus Südtirol --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2013 (UTC) Hallo Wolfgang, ich antworte mal in unserer Muttersprache. Vielen Dank für die "Promotion" des Bildes und die Tipps. Die Unschärfe am Turm habe ich erst bemerkt, nachdem ich es eingestellt hatte und es sind meine ersten Aufnahmen mit einem TS Objektiv. Da ist noch einiges schiefgegangen, z.B. die richtige manuelle Blendenvorwahl. Viele Grüße aus Wiesbaden. 11:06, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Arcalino (talk)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche St. Engelbert in St. Ingbert-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringkirche Wiesbaden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support good quality --A.Savin 10:17, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruegge View from Rozenhoedkaai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Kirche Wiesbaden-Dotzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would add the coordindates into the Location template. --Tuxyso 11:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Arcalino 12:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringkirche von Westen2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 18:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Evangelische Kirche Wiesbaden-Dotzheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but I would add the coordindates into the Location template. --Tuxyso 11:25, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review --Arcalino 12:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringkirche von Westen2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 18:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm Biebrich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Interview for Wikimedia Blog[edit]

Hi Arcalino,

My name is Donna and I'm a communications volunteer with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. I hope sending this message in English is okay, but let me know if you would prefer another language. We have a feature on the Wikimedia blog [2] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on Wikimedia Commons. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/ Given that your photo "Bruegge, View from Rozenhoedkaai, blue hour" is scheduled for 25 June, we'd love to do a short interview with you by email to discuss your photography and your POTD. Please let me know if you would be interested! You can email me DPeterson@wikimedia.org or respond on my talk page.

Thanks,

DPeterson (WMF) (talk) 23:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich habe Foto und Blog gesehen, meinen Glückwunsch - auch zum Reiseziel Brügge. Besten Gruß Ziko (talk) 12:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Glückwünsche! Arcalino (talk) 11:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mainz Theodor-Heuss-Bruecke blaue Stunde Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mainz Theodor-Heuss-Bruecke blaue Stunde Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 ![edit]

* * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:25, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für die Denkmaltopographie[edit]

Hallo Arcalino,

vor zehn Tagen endete der vierte Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit mehr als 35 Tausend Fotos hat Deutschland wie in den Vorjahren ein gutes Ergebnis erreicht und einen Anteil von 14 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 40 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 651 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Schon zum Abschluss des Wettbewerbs waren rund 6000 Fotos (=17 %) in Listen und Artikel eingebunden. Einen detaillierten Überblick zu den Fotos, den Bundesländern und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite.

Die deutsche Jury hat nun die eingereichten Beiträge übernommen und ist gegenwärtig dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu den Kulturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am nächsten Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg. Du darfst gespannt sein und all Deine Freunde bitten, Dir die Daumen zu drücken.

Die preisgekrönten 100 Gewinner-Fotos werden in der Woche ab dem 20. Oktober veröffentlicht. Auf dieser Grundlage wird auch in diesem Jahr ein Kalender-Poster für 2015 gedruckt werden.

Auf zwei Möglichkeiten einer weiteren aktiven Mitwirkung an unserem Denkmal-Projekt möchten wir bei dieser Gelegenheit hinweisen bzw. Dich dazu einladen:

  • Unsere Freunde in Österreich haben mit einem gerade gestarteten Denkmal-Cup das Editieren von Denkmallisten und Denkmalartikeln in den Focus gerückt. Bis Ende des Jahres kannst Du Punkte sammeln und Preise gewinnen. Dabei geht es mit diesem Wettbewerb nicht nur um Kulturdenkmale in AT oder D, sondern generell um Denkmale in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia, als offen für alle Länder.
WLM-Aktivisten sind herzlich eingeladen, bei der Betreuung des Messestandes sowie in den Gesprächen über Möglichkeiten einer partnerschaftlichen Zusammenarbeit mit den Denkmalbehörden mitzuwirken. Die Reisekosten übernimmt für 8-10 registrierte Standbetreuer WMDE. Es muss nicht der gesamte Messezeitraum sein, auch eine Mitwirkung an 2 Tagen hilft uns, den Beitrag der Wikipedia für die Denkmaltopographie sichtbar zu machen.

Und schließlich gilt: Nach dem Wettbewerb ist vor dem Wettbewerb. Bereits jetzt kann jeder mit der Planung von Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 beginnen. Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross), 11.10.2014

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

Hallo Arcalino,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Rio-Andirrio-Bridge in construction 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Glorious 93 (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]