Commons:Valued image candidates

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations

Skip to most valued reviews

Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques. Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria. A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope. The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules. An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR. If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

Valued Image links: Main VI page Valued image candidates Valued image criteria Valued image scope Valued image value Nomination procedure Review procedure Most Valued Review Promotion rules Valued image closure How to nominate an image for VI status Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination. Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review. Adding a new nomination (image) Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button. Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage. Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section: |My-image-filename.jpg so that it looks like this: {{VICs ... |My-image-filename.jpg }} and save the candidate list. Renomination Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review. Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination. Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination. Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in |date={{subst:VI-time}} Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review). Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with |nominator=~~~ Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure. Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}") replace the review parameter with |review= {{subst:VIC-archive}} }} Save the page. There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews. Save the previous reviews archive page Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list. How to open a Most Valued Review There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: === Scope === {{VICs |candidate1.jpg |candidate2.jpg }} where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR. The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing. How to review the candidates How to review an image Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it). Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion. Review procedure On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters. Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six. Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination. Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries. If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued. If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR. Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows: You type You get When *{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~  Comment My comment. -- Example You have a comment. *{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~  Info My information. -- Example You have information. *{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote. *{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria. *{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~  Question My question. -- Example You have a question. *{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria. If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template. Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page. How to update the status Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate: status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border). status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border). status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border). status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border). Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized. Changes in scope during the review period The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

55,177 closed valued image candidates
Closed as				Nominations
Promoted			49,601 (89.9%)
Undecided			3,085 (5.6%)
Declined			2,491 (4.5%)

New valued image nominations

Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shougissime (talk) on 2024-05-22 21:11 (UTC) Scope: Tadej Pogačar - in race Used in: fr:5e étape du Tour de France 2023, en:Tadej Pogačar,et:Tadej Pogačar; nl:Tadej Pogačar, ca:Tadej Pogačar Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-24 01:16 (UTC) Scope: Cygnus olor (mute swan) swimming (juvenile in November)  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus Tried my best. Let me know if it still needs tweaking. WildMouse76 (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:19, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Oppose Scope format is now fine but the month of November being a defining sub-scope is concerning. While yet to be determined I am OK with a scope for this VI nomination being a Cygnus olor (mute swan) with sub-scopes of this being a juvenile engaged in swimming. Both subscopes are behavioral characteristics of the species. What seems too narrow is to have a further 3rd sub-scope being the month of November. Per COM:VIS, specifically the section on animal scopes, why would this image of a swimming juvenile mute swan taken in November be more valuable than one taken in say, October or December? --GRDN711 (talk) 12:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 The months are probably due to the excessive images of this species and its stage of maturity. If you want to, I can change the scope. WildMouse76 (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2024 (UTC) If the scope is still too wide or a better picture is found, will it be acceptable to add the location to the scope? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:45, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment @GRDN711: For the hemisphere concerned there is a variation in the appearance of the animal depending on the month. This reduction in scope is not necessary, it is true, but it is entirely legitimate.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus Thank you. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:04, 25 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment This is a good image but the second part of attaining a VI rating is being the best, and therefore most valuable, image within a defined scope. Per COM:VICR (1), a Valued Image is "the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination". Further, per COMVICR (2), a "scope is not a simple description of the image. Rather, it defines a generic field or category within which the image is the most valuable example. The scope must be broad enough to be realistically useful to somebody who wishes to search the VI repository". This also means that the scope must be a sufficiently generic subject field (not too wide or narrow), also allows another photographer with a similar image, to challenge an existing VI-rated image within that generic scope in MVR. For an acceptable scope, start with the direction found in COM:VIS section on Animals (also applies to birds) of one VI scope per species. Ok, if the image is identified as a distinct sub-species, good on that too. And then there are the sex and general age differences that may affect species appearance - male, female, LGBQ (?), pairs, flocks, adult (assumed if not specified), juvenile, cygnet, hatchling, egg - fine there as well. And let's not forget the various behavioral characteristics of the species - flying, swimming, procreating, resting with eyes closed etc. - fine there too. Location is only relevant if it affects the visual appearance of the swan in the image. If such a distinction exists, the bird is usually defined as a sub-species as there is always a lively debate in avian circles about the definitions of bird taxonomy. All species, including humans, change appearance with age but by date/time stamp goes too far as part of a generic scope. I accept the general chronological avian benchmarks of egg, hatchling, cygnet, juvenile and adult. By my rough count, there are about 50 possible and valid possible VI scopes. IMHO, find one of them that works within the COM:VIS framework. Be aware that even if you do find a suitable scope for this image, there may be others that may be just as good (there are about 200 images of swimming juvenile mute swans). There also needs to be an appropriate scope-link category identified. This is the VI nomination challenge. --GRDN711 (talk) 14:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 Then what scope do YOU think best fits this image, since you think my suggested scope isn't good enough? WildMouse76 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC) The choice of image and scope definition falls to the nominator, @WildMouse76. If I had an easy answer I would have suggested it. The most obvious that comes to mind is Cygnus olor (mute swan) - swimming juvenile, wtih appropriate scope-link. However, with about 200 images of swimming juveniles to review to see if yours would be considered the most valuable, the result remains uncertain. --GRDN711 (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2024 (UTC) @GRDN711 What if the scope was changed to Cygnus olor (mute swan) swimming (juvenile) - right side? Would that be better? WildMouse76 (talk) 05:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment WildMouse76 - IMHO, there is nothing in the species description of Cygnus olor that indicates that one side of a mute swan is visually distinct from the other. IMHO "right side" is not an acceptable 3rd sub-scope for this nomination as it just adds extra description that unnecessarily narrows the scope. There are cases (vehicles, ships, cars, motorcycles, buildings, even wing configurations on butterflies and moths), where viewpoint is relevant but IMO not here. You should note that there are some subjects (seagulls, squirrels, swans, dogs, cats etc. come to mind) that are quite common and thousands of images are taken annually, with many uploaded. A good image may be QI but finding a "just right" scope in VI where it is the best and most valuable, can be a challenge. I will review your nomination again once the final scope is set. @GRDN711 How about this one? (Birds swimming facing right - Cygnus olor (mute swan; juvenile)? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
View promotion Nominated by: Drow male (talk) on 2024-05-24 07:07 (UTC) Scope: Bernardo Penabade is a Galician philologist, teacher and writer. Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used. --Thi (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-24 10:38 (UTC) Scope: Dacia Jogger Hybrid - left rear view  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:54, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: WildMouse76 (talk) on 2024-05-24 14:39 (UTC) Scope: Milvus migrans (black kite) in flight with prey  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:56, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-24 16:56 (UTC) Scope: Moche pottery in the Museo Arqueológico Rafael Larco Herrera, Lima (Peru)  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:08, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-05-24 20:39 (UTC) Scope: Immanuel Kant by Johann Gottlieb Becker Used in: en:Immanuel Kant, de:Immanuel Kant, en:History of philosophy  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:39, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: El Golli Mohamed (talk) on 2024-05-24 20:54 (UTC) Scope: Phoenicopterus roseus (Greater flamingo)  Comment We must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image. The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. and : We must add a geocoding in caption. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Is there please a tutorial that explains how to do this? here are the coordinates 34.692063, 10.749685 El Golli Mohamed (talk) 11:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)  Comment Ok for the name of the bird which is perfectly formatted. I added the geocoding in your image: look at the changes. For the rest, open the competing images and get inspired by what is done. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Useful and very used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-24 22:24 (UTC) Scope: Nazca pottery in the Museo Larco.- Code catalogue ML031895, Lima (Peru)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:11 (UTC) Scope: Reformierte Kirche Vnà South side. Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:37 (UTC) Scope: Saint Peter and Saint Andrew by Jacobello di Bonomo - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:38 (UTC) Scope: Le Christ aux liens (Christ in Bonds) - Musée Goya  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:00, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
View promotion Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-25 04:40 (UTC) Scope: Mia moglie by Lino Selvatico  Support Useful and used--Pierre André (talk) 16:19, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)	View promotion Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-25 05:08 (UTC) Scope: Malleus albus (White hammer oyster), left valve  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:01, 25 May 2024 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-25 10:10 (UTC) Scope: Moche pottery showing episodes from the mythological epic of Ai Apaec, in Larco Museum.- Code catalogue: ML018882, Lima Peru Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-25 15:56 (UTC) Scope: St. Simon und Juda church in Trier Stained Glass Window in the church with an image of St Simon & St Judas.  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-25 20:06 (UTC) Scope: Monument to Soviet soldiers-countrymen in Chovnovytsia Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 26 May 2024 Scope: Charaxes solon sulphureus (Sulphur Black Rajah), ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-26 04:28 (UTC) Scope: Martyrdom of Mammes of Caesarea - Francesco dei Franceschi - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-04-29 05:15 (UTC) Scope: Fraxinus ornus (flowers)  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-26 04:33 (UTC) Scope: The little cloister of the Church of Santa Caterina dei Servi di Maria  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 21:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-26 05:02 (UTC) Scope: Senilia senilis (Senile Ark), right valve  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 26 May 2024 Scope: Lethe vindhya vindhya (Assam Black Forester), ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Thi (talk) on 2024-05-26 09:05 (UTC) Scope: Thomas Paine by Laurent Dabos (1792) Used in: en:Thomas Paine  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-26 15:29 (UTC) Scope: Stele of Pacopampa in the Museo Larco.- Code catalogue ML300025, Lima (Peru) Used in: Global usage  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 00:55 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Iris van Herpen, Nautiloid dress  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:02 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Maria Grazia Chiuri, New Junon dress  Comment It appears that there is a copyright on the author's works....--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC) @Archaeodontosaurus: COM:CLOTHING - the only copyright to consider with clothing are separable graphical elements, typically. — Rhododendrites talk |  11:09, 27 May 2024 (UTC) OK I understand correctly and it's good news  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:04 (UTC) Scope: Clothing designed by Iris van Herpen, Physalia dress Reason: Not in use yet, but notable dress selected for a current fashion exhibition at The Metropolitan Museum of Art. -- — Rhododendrites talk |   Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: — Rhododendrites talk |  on 2024-05-27 01:09 (UTC) Scope: Voss (Alexander McQueen collection), razor clamshell dress  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-27 03:57 (UTC) Scope: Detail Alter Krahnen (Trier) Detail (barred window)  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:05 (UTC) Scope: Anthony the Great, 17th century Spanish school, Musée Goya of Castres  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:07 (UTC) Scope: Signora in giallo by Lino Selvatico - Musei civici Santa Caterina Treviso  Support Useful and used. --Pierre André (talk) 08:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:37 (UTC) Scope: Senilia senilis (Senile Ark), left valve  Support Best in scope.--Pierre André (talk) 08:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:39 (UTC) Scope: Sonchus hierrensis (Hierro goose thistle), habitus  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-27 05:41 (UTC) Scope: Sonchus hierrensis (Hierro goose thistle), inflorescences  Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 07:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-05-27 07:37 (UTC) Scope: Land Rover Defender 130 (L663) - right rear view Used in: de:Land Rover Defender (L663), nl:Land Rover Defender (L663)  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-05-27 Scope: Calinaga aborica (Dark Freak) - ventral  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-27 15:40 (UTC) Scope: Idole Chincha Museo Larco nr ML400670 (Lima), Peru  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Shougissime (talk) on 2024-05-27 16:38 (UTC) Scope: Jaakko Hänninen - portrait Used in: da:Jaakko Hänninen, de:Jaakko Hänninen, en:Jaakko Hänninen, es:Jaakko Hänninen, fa:Jaakko Hänninen, fi:Jaakko Hänninen, it:Jaakko Hänninen, no:Jaakko Hänninen, no:Jaakko Hänninen, pl:Jaakko Hänninen, pt:Jaakko Hänninen, ru:Jaakko Hänninen Reason: At this time, most recent picture of this rider available on Commons with a good quality and last jersey of the team. -- Shougissime (talk) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-27 19:11 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Cherniavka Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-28 04:21 (UTC) Scope: Church tower of the Baselgia rifurmada, Ardez Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland.  Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 05:28, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Salvator Mundi - Quentin Metsys - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:09 (UTC) Scope: Stories of Alatiel - Arrival of the Bride - Museo Correr  Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 05:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:14 (UTC) Scope: Well head in Campiello S. Maria Nova - Venice  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-28 05:18 (UTC) Scope: Lioconcha lorenziana (Lorenz's Pitar Venus), right valve  Support Best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:33, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Atudu (talk) on 2024-05-28 Scope: Polyura narcaeus lissainei ( Naga Nawab) - ventral  Comment Impossible to choose from a plethoric category where more than half of the images are redundant. You must remove images that make no sense in the category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Pierre André (talk) on 2024-05-28 15:52 (UTC) Scope: Moche portrait ceramic in Museo Arqueológico Larco, (Lima).- N° ML000174  Support best in scope.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-05-28 17:30 (UTC) Scope: Pulpit of the Reformierte Kirche San Bastian (Zernez) Used in: Cultural property of national significance in Switzerland  Support Best in scope. --Pierre André (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Nikride (talk) on 2024-05-28 19:44 (UTC) Scope: World War II memorial in Frontivka Used in: Global usage  Support Useful and used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-29 05:02 (UTC) Scope: Ancient Roman busts in the Museo archeologico nazionale (Venice) - Portrait of a younth inv.136  Support Useful --Llez (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.
Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-29 05:03 (UTC) Scope: Philip IV as a Hunter by Diego Vélasquez Musée Goya, Castres France  Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.	Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-05-29 05:06 (UTC) Scope: Ceiling of the Chapel of the Innocents - Four Evangelist, Complesso di Santa Caterina - Treviso Open for review.
Review it! (edit) Nominated by: Llez (talk) on 2024-05-29 05:13 (UTC) Scope: Lioconcha lorenziana (Lorenz's Pitar Venus), left valve Open for review.

Pending Most valued review candidates

Remote view of Florence Duomo by night

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Mile (talk) on 2015-03-11 15:22 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by nigth Reason: So far best nigth/dusk photo from Michelangelo hill, would say best remote view in general (dusk view is far more beneficial - colors). -- Mile (talk)  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 17:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: dllu (t,c) on 2024-05-22 20:30 (UTC) Scope: Remote view of Florence Duomo by night Reason: In my opinion technically superior to existing VI File:Florence Duomo from Michelangelo hill.jpg -- dllu (t,c)  Oppose The left tower is less visible. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:14, 28 May 2024 (UTC) Open for review.

Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris)

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: Sebring12Hrs (talk) on 2024-03-31 13:46 (UTC) Scope: Au Vieux Paris d'Arcole (Paris) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London

Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2024 (UTC) on 2024-03-23 18:48 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London Used in: en:Bertrand Russell, de, es  Comment This is the most valuable image in scope, but only if the scope does not include the base. If the scope includes the base, we have to consider whether the dark File:Bust of Bernard Russell in Red Lion Square (01).jpg is better than File:I feel I almost know this guy - geograph.org.uk - 1656321.jpg, which is fenced off. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC) I opened the most valued review. 1656321.jpg seems to be taken before the restoration. --Thi (talk) 11:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)	Review Page (edit) Nominated by: --Thi (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC) on 2024-04-12 11:27 (UTC) Scope: Bust of Bertrand Russell by Marcelle Quinton, Red Lion Square, London  Comment Ok for the base, but wa can't really see the face. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC) Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 06:23, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

Mavathoor Kere (lake) - correction of scope

To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.

Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.